Ana içeriğe atla

Capitalism’s Impact on Colonization in Reluctant Fundamentalist

 


Reluctant Fundamentalist presents a unique narration that flows backward. The narrative reminisces while a stranger listens quietly. The narrative’s memories revolve around his journey to America to become a successful analyst. In the journey, the narrative is subjected to a change due to the capitalist environment in America. In the narration’s transformation from a regular immigrant to a capitalist American dream pursuer, the ways in which capitalism weaves into the individual’s mind-set become prominent. More importantly, the narration’s realization of capitalism’s corruptive grip on him and on his nation displays the capitalistic structure’s enforcing impact on colonization. In this essay, I shall analyze how the protagonist’s beliefs and identity face changes and how these changes show capitalism’s corruptive impact on colonization and I will argue that capitalism’s competitive nature

The main character’s journey to find himself a place in the capitalist structure of America sheds a light on the unseen aspects of brain drain and how it enforces colonialization. The main character’s hardworking and well-disciplined nature acquires him a place in the capitalist America. We see that only the most talented and brightest students are to be selected by such a system. “We international students were sourced from around the globe, sifted not only by well-honed standardized tests but by painstakingly customized evaluations—interviews, essays, recommendations—until the best and the brightest of us had been identified” (6). Changez’s observation unveils capitalism’s competitive nature that eliminates the weak and rewards the strong. More importantly, as the plot unfolds, we see capitalism’s oppressive structure subjecting individuals’ cultural identity to a sense of loss. Changez’s cultural identity faces such a loss displaying capitalism’s oppressive aspect that captures individuals into its corruptive grip “But not on that day. On that day, I did not think of myself as a Pakistani, but as an Underwood Samson trainee, and my firm’s impressive offices made me proud.” Changez’s sense of value also alters according to the value determined by the capitalist standpoint “and my firm’s impressive offices made me proud”(19). Changez here implies that he seeks importance and value in status and approval from people in charge displaying a capitalist mind-set. Jim’s speech explaining the rank system in the firm emphasizes the capitalist structure’s corruptive mind-set that finds value in the quality and amount of work “We’ll rank you every six months. You’ll know your rankings. Your bonuses and staffing will depend on them. If you do well, you’ll be rewarded. If you don’t, you’ll be out the door. It’s that simple. You’ll have your first rankings at the end of this training program”(19). Here Jim portraits a competitive work environment for the employees suggesting that their values will be based on their” rankings” meaning the amount and quality of work. This strips down any sentimental or traditional values and puts forward the materialistic aspect of life to an important standpoint. Ultimately capitalism’s competitive and overwhelming structure alters how individuals view the world. Changez’s change from an American Dream pursuer to a critic of capitalism emphasizes capitalism’s impact on the individual’s perception of the world. Kennedy contemplates on Changez’s change and suggests that “When he adopts this different way of observing, he is able to focus on the “Mughal miniatures and ancient carpets” of his parents’ house, as well as its “excellent library,” all of which enable him to realize that his home “was far from impoverished; indeed, it was rich with history” (142).” (8) Kennedy’s contemplation on Changez’s view of the world reveals the aftermath of Changez’s realization of capitalism and how it affects colonization. Changez can differentiate western and eastern perception and it is the precise reason why Changez comments on his home’s richness with history. Changez’s realization peaks when he is able to understand the importance of history, culture, and the nation which makes Changez’s conflicting identities prominent showing capitalism’s impact on individuals and colonization’s.

 Changez’s attempt to adapt to such a competitive and cruel system shows the struggles of immigrants leaving their countries for educational and financial reasons reinforcing colonization. They are exposed to such mechanized and cruel systems dissociating them from their cultures and leaving their countries undeveloped. Changez in the process of realizing the corruptive nature of capitalism contemplates capitalism’s tendency to enforce colonization and observes that “On the flight, I noticed how many of my fellow passengers were similar to me in age: college students and young professionals, heading back after the holidays. I found it ironic; children and the elderly were meant to be sent away from impending battles, but in our case, it was the fittest and brightest who were leaving, those who in the past would have been most expected to remain” (58). Changez here concentrates on capitalism’s most destructive impact on the colonization and resents the fact that the brightest and the most important leave the country in the pursuit of wealth, status, or simply an escape from the colonized nation. Hartnell concentrates on capitalism’s aspect to be “forward-looking” and asserts that “Jim thus makes the future of the western narrative available to Changez, suggesting that he allow himself to be transformed by his new environment, which in the world of business in which Changez finds himself is relentlessly forward-looking” (p.342).  Hartnell’s comment on Changez’s transformation into a capitalist individual alludes to the idea that capitalism provides escapism from the hardship of finding value in life. The need for efficiency and swiftness in capitalist structure initially drives Changez away from sentimentality and his cultural identity letting him focus on business. Regardless of what the reason for brain drain is, Changez’s transformation sheds a light on capitalism’s impact on colonization and individuals.

In conclusion, Hamid’s “Reluctant Fundamentalist” displays the ways capitalism finds its way into the developing and colonized countries. Capitalism in the novel is characterized to be a venomous snake that corrupts individuals’ minds and changes their perspective of the world. The developed countries offer opportunities that developing countries cannot offer and it is this precise reason Changez travels to America. In Changez’s journey in America, he becomes exposed to capitalism which initially he finds meaning but later he realizes its corruptive influence on him. It is this reason he resents to be working in Underwood Samson and considers himself to be a janissary. Ultimately, Changez’s narration displays how young brains are influenced by capitalism and how it inevitably enforces colonization.

Hamid, M. and Rau, R., 2012. The Reluctant Fundamentalist. Braunschweig: Diesterweg.

Kennedy, Valerie. "Changez/Cengiz's Changing Beliefs in The Reluctant Fundamentalist." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.6 (2018): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3321>

Hartnell, A. (2010). Moving through America: Race, place and resistance in Mohsin Hamid’s The Reluctant Fundamentalist. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 46(3–4), 336–348

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Rhetoric in Hobbes' Leviathan

  Hobbes’ Word Play Hobbes argues in favor of a monarch or an oligarch. To be more precise, he is in favor of the idea that multiplicity comes with complexity, harming the integrity of the state. In his opinion, men are mostly power-driven, greedy beings who must surrender themselves to a sovereign power that can spread the terror of punishment. According to Hobbes, this fear of punishment is the only effective motivating force that can keep people from brutally murdering each other. While this Hobbesian idea of the state portrays the sovereign’s subjects almost as though they are slaves, this essay will argue that Hobbes is not fundamentally against liberty and allows it within the constraints of laws. Hobbes's description of liberty suggests that only external impediments are against freedom. He states that liberty is “the absence of external impediments” (189) and, although these impediments may take away man’s power to do what he would, they do not prevent men from using th...

Rousseau on Legitimacy of State

Hobbes'dan sonra Rousseau okumayı Proust'tan sonra Daphnes ve Chloe okumaya benzetiyorum. Proust aşkı öyle yapay, çıkarcı ve öyle çirkin yansıtıyor ki, ondan sonra okuduğun her romana ister istemez Proust'un realist bakış açısından bakıyorsun. Belki de realizm sevdamı bırakmalıyımdır. Hobbes'un determinist bakış açısı da birçok argümanını epey ikna edici kılıyor. Bazen bu bakış açısından kaçmak istiyor insan. Hobbes kimmiş lan, ben ölümlü tanrıya irademi falan teslim edemem, gayet özgürüm demek istiyor. Yine de gel gör ki Hobbes haklı. Nasıl, Kant ödev ahlakında nasıl ki herkes davranışlarının topluma yansıdığını varsayarak hareket etmeli diyorsa, Hobbes da yapılmak istemediğini yapma diyor. Buna karşı çıkmak da biraz zor. Rousseau abi Social Contract'ında denese de Emile kitabındaki ikna ediciliğini devam ettiremiyor gibi hissediyorum. Birazdan okuyacak olduğun yazıda da oldukça soyut fikirler göreceksin ve yer yer kendine e ama niye diye soracaksın. Bil ki ben de ...

Hobbes’ Paradox

Hobbes’ Paradox Resolved According to Hobbes, people are born with passions that ultimately lead them into a never-ending war. They require artificial power to stop killing each other. Unless such a power is erected, Hobbes suggests, leaving the state of nature is impossible since people are not inclined to cooperate and trust each other. The core reason why it is impossible to leave the state of nature is because of the innate passions people have that drive them to be constantly in conflict. Hobbes states that in the condition of nature, “any reasonable suspicion” renders any covenant or promise invalid since “bonds of words are too weak to bridle men’s ambition, avarice, anger, and other passions…” (196). Here, Hobbes highlights the importance of punishments, suggesting that without the motivating fear of punishments, covenants are practically invalid. It is also important to understand what Hobbes means by the condition of nature. He argues that because men are born equal, they...