Larkin presents a depressing and cynical gaze on domestic life in his poem “Afternoons”. His observation captures the tedious lives of young mothers and their children who will replace their parents. Larkin proposes an inescapable cycle of life in which he explores the detrimental nature of domestic life to the individual’s identity and individuality. In this essay, I will examine Larkin’s depiction of the cycle of life and I will argue that domestic life and the inescapable cycle of life deprives women of free will by imprisoning them to a domestic life where they lose their identity and individuality.
Larkin’s
observation of domestic life’s mundane structure shows its imprisoning nature
against the young mothers. The title of the poem carries utmost importance as
it foreshadows the narrative’s tired tone which enforces one of the core themes
of the poem; the repetitive cycle of life. The plural suffix “Afternoons” is
important as it conveys that the poem is not addressing one precise afternoon,
rather it addresses every afternoon. To be precise, the afternoon is a metaphor
used to allude to a tedious stage of life. The fact that it addresses every
afternoon suggests that the narrative’s acute observation stems from a surplus
number of incidents portraying this tedious stage of life to be repetitive and
common. The first stanza enriches such imagery by pointing out the mundane life
of the young mothers who are gathered “in the hollows of afternoons”. “[H]ollows
of afternoon” (Larkin) alludes to a meaningless period of time at which the
young mothers assemble and are “setting free their children” The last line of
the first stanza ends with a strong implication hinting that people are imprisoned
by the domestic lifestyle. Setting something free implies that it was once imprisoned.
Therefore, the last line, “setting free their children” (Larkin) implies
that “the new recreation ground” (Larkin) provides a contemporary escape from
imprisonment. However, such escape is only available to the children. Here, the
absence of freedom becomes evident; the adults, mostly, the young mothers are
deprived of such freedom. They only get to assemble and do their duties. How
the narrative addresses young mothers, diminishes their individuality and
identity. It
reduces the identity of the women to being only a mother.
Also, the verb, “assemble” introduces a cold and tedious tone which depicts
young mothers’ assemble as a mandatory and possibly tedious gathering. This
young mothers’ imagery depicts them as martyrs imprisoned
by the domestic life’s tedious and repetitive structure. More importantly,
these mothers are described to be alone, “Behind them, at intervals, /Stand
husbands in skilled trades,” (Larkin). Their husbands are there to help the
young mothers but “at intervals” suggests that such help is only visible on the
surface. Thereby, the young mothers are alone and are obliged to nurture the
children. Such a responsibility that requires constant attention and time
allows the domestic life to imprison the young mothers. Ultimately, the fact that young mothers have
a choice or saying in their lives is an illusion, their free will is obstructed
by the heavy burden domestic life subjects them to.
Young
mothers’ imprisonment and marriage’s inevitable withering becomes more evident
as the narratives unveil the burden of domestic workload and domestic life on
the marriage. In the second stanza, the narrative introduces the burden of
domestic workload which emphasizes young mothers’ imprisonment; “An estateful
of washing” (Larkin). This line stands for the never-ending workload that
resembles an inescapable chain tied to the young mothers’ wrists. To put it
another way, the domestic life’s repetitive and demanding nature entraps the
young mothers into its firm and inescapable grip. The narrative’s touch on
marriage and love enforces this corrupting inescapable grip and portrays
marriage to be doomed to fade away. The description of the remnants of the
wedding hints at the withered state of the marriages.
“And
the albums, lettered,
Our Wedding, lying
Near the television:” (Larkin)
The wedding albums
resemble the love between the couples. However, as the love fades away, the
wedding albums start to become a resemblance of the inevitable loss of intimacy
and love. Also, the wedding albums are placed near the television which
symbolizes ingenuity.[TW6]
The double meaning of “lying” (Larkin) enforces the image of ingenuity[TW7]
by personifying the wedding as something that can deceive. Regardless of
whether the deception is deliberate or not, the implication is that marriages
are doomed to be wrecked by the mundanity of life. The passionate romantic
relationships will inevitably turn into dutiful and lust-less relationships that
are alive out of necessity.[TW8]
Larkin portrays the cycle of life to be inescapable in which the marriage falls
into the corrupting hands of mundane and repetitive life. Ultimately, marriage
appears to be the culprit that devours the individuality of young mothers and
husbands but marriage is also the victim. The third stanza’s first two lines
suggest that marriages stem from the passionate love between the couples. This
implies that marriage is not inherently tedious. Rather it gradually becomes
tedious against the domestic life’s withering impact. Thereby, the culprit of
imprisonment of women and withering of marriages is the inescapable chains of
domestic life.
Larkin’s choice of words
and use of ambiguity allows the poem to be independent from time and place. The
last two lines of the second stanza introduce a sort of power that subjects
marriage to be withered. “Before them, the wind/ Is ruining their
courting-places.” The narrative proposes that “the wind” which symbolizes the
unavoidable injurious power ruins the marriages. Larkin’s word of choice holds
utmost importance as “the wind” resembles a sort of force that cannot be obstructed
or controlled and will always be present[TW9] .
Therefore, it is this inescapable force that dooms marriages to destruction and
individuals to the tedious cages where they lose their identity and
individuality. In the poem, this imprisoning force is applied to the young
mothers of suburban cities presenting domestic life to be this imprisoning
force. However, Larkin utilizes ambiguity in a way that implies that this force
can be in any form, yet the consequences will remain the same.
That are still
courting-places
(But the lovers are all
in school),
And their children, so
intent on
Finding more unripe
acorns, (Larkin)
The
first two lines show the monotony of life implying that there will always
people who will fall in love to end up in the marriage trap. The third and
fourth lines suggest that this monotony will continue and the children will
replace their parents. These four lines point out a cycle of life that is
unavoidable and uncontrollable which enforces the idea that there will
always be a sort of force that will maintain the cycle of life that captures
individuals and erodes their identity and individuality.[TW10] The fact that Larkin uses natural
elements, “summer” (Larkin) and “unripe acorns,” (Larkin) as metaphors
reinforce the idea that these are recurrent events that will take place.
Finally, the last two lines of the poem demonstrate Larkin’s use of ambiguity
to convey that a sort of power will present itself to the individual,
“Something is pushing them/ To the side of their own lives”. (Larkin) Larkin
does not specify “Something” (Larkin) to suggest that it could be anything
depending on time and place, yet the impact will be the same. It will diminish
the individual’s individuality and identity, forcing them to value something
else more than they value themselves.
In conclusion, Larkin
through his depiction of the inescapable cycle of life challenges the concept
of free will. Larkin portrays an ambitious rigid image of the cycle of life in
which nothing can alter it. The repetitive and mundane structure of domestic
life subjects the young mother to a heavy burden that imprisons them.
[TW2]good
[TW3]You
only need to give the author’s name the first time. Afterwards, just the line
number.
[TW4]good
[TW5]are
they really martyrs (who are also seen as heroes)? Or just people who’ve lost
their individual identities?
[TW6]How
so??
[TW7]I
think you mean ‘disingenuousness’
[TW8]good
[TW9]good
- you could say it is a kind of eroding force that wears everything down
eventually
[TW10]good
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder