Ana içeriğe atla

Hoarding as an Escapism in Silas Marner

 


   In George Eliot’s Silas Marner the narrative focuses on the character’s experience to project realistic imagery of what happens. The type of narrative allows readers to sympathize with the characters and understand their inner worlds. The plot structure also compliments the novel’s ability to show the main character’s cognitive thinking and consciousness. The narrative changes its focus to, later on, highlight the correlation between characters further deepening and enriching the story and character development. The story initially focuses on Silas Marner and how he is banished from Lantern Yard because of an unjust accusation and then it dwells on Marner’s obsession with money. In this essay, I will analyze Marner’s obsession with hoarding money and I will suggest that hoarding money grants him an escape from society and lastly it opens a new aspect of individualistic life.

 

     Hoarding money presents Marner the ability to alienate himself from society and lead an individualistic life which then grants him the independence he seeks after escaping the heavy burden he previously was subjected to in Lantern Yard. The first part of the story reveals enough of Lantern Yard for us to understand how strictly demanding it is. One of the examples showing the oppressive nature of such a religious cult can be observed when Marner thrives to acquire the approval of religious authorities to marry. Only from this, we can see how much the religious cult interferes with the personal lives of individuals. “Now, for the first time in his life, he had five bright guineas put into his hand; no man expected a share of them, and he loved no man that should offer him a share” (p.11) Here the narrative contemplates the ecstasy brought upon Marner from the feeling of independence. In other words, Marner is freed from the interfering nature of Lantern Yard and feels relieved. This alludes to the concept of individualism which Perkin puts as "the belief that the individual was best left to pursue his interests without any more interference by the state than was necessary to ensure the same freedom for other individuals "(p.111). Perkin's view on individualism helps us to form a correlation between what Marner is going through after relieving himself from the heavy pressure of the religious cult. Even though there is no "state" it is evident that Marner's independence acquires him an individualist aspect of life. Marner can pursue his interest which he previously couldn’t

     Money plays a significant role in distinguishing the complexity and unjustice nature of society and material possessions. Marner loses his every contact in the Lantern Yard. To put it another way, everything he cares about and puts effort into, he loses and migrates to Raveloe. In Raveloe his interest in money grows into a different shape. The narrative records Marner’s thoughts as follows “mysterious money had stood to him as the symbol of earthly good, and the immediate object of toil” (p.12). This sentence carries utmost importance as it conveys why Marner deeply values money and how he regards money. “immediate object of toil” implies the fact that money represents the amount of effort someone puts into something. Marner is deceived by his closest friend and he loses everything he puts importance to “Poor Marner went out with that despair in his soul—that shaken trust in God and man, which is little short of madness to a loving nature”(p.9). Here the narrative emphasizes the trust between God and man suggesting that the fundamental basis of Marner’s beliefs are shaken and hence Marner is in a metaphorical abyss. Consequently, money which is the opposite of religion where everything is vague and requires people to have belief replaces the abyss and allows Marner to feel the reward of his efforts. The fact that Marner hides and counts his money every night as if he sexualizes and uses it as a replacement for human interactions reinforces the idea that money is an escape for Marner. Chamayou argues that “This scene also illustrates the Victorian fascination with materialism, the intoxicating power of money which could end up possessing people and depriving them of their human characteristics. Through his passion for and devotion to mere objects, Silas is in turn deformed, objectified, and fashioned into correspondence with the gold coins: he ends up being ‘yellow’ (1.2.20)—a yellow slave in his locked cottage, a metaphor for his heart.”(Chamayou) Chamayou’s contemplation on how money possesses Marner and how Victororain's fascination is represented through Marner’s fetish for them. Ultimately, the material possessions precisely money carries utmost importance. Working for money contrary to worshiping a god and participating in cultic ceremonies, rewards something tangible. The more Marner works, the more he earns money, and hence he feels accomplished and fulfilled, however, he withdraws to his cabinet and is deprived of human interactions which is an indication that Marner alienates himself from society with the help of the rewarding feeling of hoarding money.

“It had been a clinging life; and though the object round which its fibers had club was a dead disrupted thing, it satisfied the need for clinging” (p.62)

The narrative touches upon how money plays a huge role in giving purpose to Marner. The use of the word here is important as it draws the imagery of money as a negative object that only allows Marner to “cling” to life. The action of clinging implies Marner’s obsession which then enforces the centralized position of money in Marner’s life. 

 

     In conclusion, Silas Marner uses the money to escape from the complexity of human interactions. In Lantern Yard he faces the deceptive nature of men. The consequences of trusting people devour him leaving him nothing. However, money rewards him with tangible objects guineas that he can physically touch and see. This gives him the opportunity to appreciate himself and his efforts which he dearly does and starts to obsess over it creating an escapist aspect of money. In the end, he pursues an individualistic life and values material possessions that do not lie to him like genuine. Even though he can be deceived by counterfeit bills and by theifs like Dunstan it is still the human interaction that brings him destruction, not the objects. Overall, it is the concept of hoarding money that satisfies Marner, he does not intend to use it on anything, but he simply wants to save it. Therefore, it does not matter whether the money is real or not. The concept of it grants him the ultimate escapism and allows him to taste an individualism which he never tastes in Lantern Yard. 

 

Perkin, Harold. “Individualism versus Collectivism in Nineteenth-Century Britain: A False Antithesis.” Journal of British Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, 1977, pp. 105–118. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/175694. Accessed 20 Nov. 2020.

Massei-Chamayou, M. (2015, September 06). 'How the guineas shone as they came pouring outn of the dark leather... Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://journals.openedition.org/cve/2022?lang=en

Brayley, A. J., & Eliot, G. (2009). Silas Marner. Harlow, Essex, Eng.: Pearson Education Limited.

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Rhetoric in Hobbes' Leviathan

  Hobbes’ Word Play Hobbes argues in favor of a monarch or an oligarch. To be more precise, he is in favor of the idea that multiplicity comes with complexity, harming the integrity of the state. In his opinion, men are mostly power-driven, greedy beings who must surrender themselves to a sovereign power that can spread the terror of punishment. According to Hobbes, this fear of punishment is the only effective motivating force that can keep people from brutally murdering each other. While this Hobbesian idea of the state portrays the sovereign’s subjects almost as though they are slaves, this essay will argue that Hobbes is not fundamentally against liberty and allows it within the constraints of laws. Hobbes's description of liberty suggests that only external impediments are against freedom. He states that liberty is “the absence of external impediments” (189) and, although these impediments may take away man’s power to do what he would, they do not prevent men from using th...

Rousseau on Legitimacy of State

Hobbes'dan sonra Rousseau okumayı Proust'tan sonra Daphnes ve Chloe okumaya benzetiyorum. Proust aşkı öyle yapay, çıkarcı ve öyle çirkin yansıtıyor ki, ondan sonra okuduğun her romana ister istemez Proust'un realist bakış açısından bakıyorsun. Belki de realizm sevdamı bırakmalıyımdır. Hobbes'un determinist bakış açısı da birçok argümanını epey ikna edici kılıyor. Bazen bu bakış açısından kaçmak istiyor insan. Hobbes kimmiş lan, ben ölümlü tanrıya irademi falan teslim edemem, gayet özgürüm demek istiyor. Yine de gel gör ki Hobbes haklı. Nasıl, Kant ödev ahlakında nasıl ki herkes davranışlarının topluma yansıdığını varsayarak hareket etmeli diyorsa, Hobbes da yapılmak istemediğini yapma diyor. Buna karşı çıkmak da biraz zor. Rousseau abi Social Contract'ında denese de Emile kitabındaki ikna ediciliğini devam ettiremiyor gibi hissediyorum. Birazdan okuyacak olduğun yazıda da oldukça soyut fikirler göreceksin ve yer yer kendine e ama niye diye soracaksın. Bil ki ben de ...

Hobbes’ Paradox

Hobbes’ Paradox Resolved According to Hobbes, people are born with passions that ultimately lead them into a never-ending war. They require artificial power to stop killing each other. Unless such a power is erected, Hobbes suggests, leaving the state of nature is impossible since people are not inclined to cooperate and trust each other. The core reason why it is impossible to leave the state of nature is because of the innate passions people have that drive them to be constantly in conflict. Hobbes states that in the condition of nature, “any reasonable suspicion” renders any covenant or promise invalid since “bonds of words are too weak to bridle men’s ambition, avarice, anger, and other passions…” (196). Here, Hobbes highlights the importance of punishments, suggesting that without the motivating fear of punishments, covenants are practically invalid. It is also important to understand what Hobbes means by the condition of nature. He argues that because men are born equal, they...